Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
COS Heidelberg Banner
Developmental Biology

Prof. Dr. Ingrid Lohmann

Prof. Dr. Ingrid Lohmann
Prof. Dr. Ingrid Lohmann
Im Neuenheimer Feld 230
69120 Heidelberg
Fon +49 6221 54-5523
Fax +49 6221 54-6424
ingrid.lohmann AET

Current research in my lab is based on an integrated approach of advanced genomic, genetic, molecular, and biochemical methods together with extensive computational analysis and simulation to determine on the one hand how Hox proteins orchestrate different aspects of development, with a special focus on stem cell maintenance in the testis and nervous system development and morphogenesis, and, on the other hand, how they achieve the spatio-temporally restricted expression of their target genes in specific cell and tissue types. In addition, we have also started to identify and study processes involved in cancer formation and progression.


Transcriptional Control of Development by Hox Proteins

One of the paradigm-shifting breakthroughs in biology was the discovery that the molecular mechanisms underlying many developmental pathways have been conserved during evolution even between distantly related species. This quantum-leap was triggered by the realisation that Hox genes, which were known to specify segment identities in flies, are also present in humans and worms.

Hox genes were originally discovered in Drosophila because of their drastic homeotic mutant phenotypes and are expressed in specific domains along the main Anterior/Posterior body axis. They code for transcription factors, which assign specific morphologies to individual segments by regulating distinct sets of downstream genes. While the Hox proteins are active in thousands of cells throughout an animal’s life, many of their downstream genes are only expressed in specific subpopulations of cells. Thus, in order to understand Hox dependent cell behaviour during development and diversification of morphogenetic structures along the body axis, it is essential to identify the function and the cell-type specific regulation of many of their downstream genes. However, until recently only a few Hox downstream genes and their corresponding Hox regulated enhancers were known. Consequently, the cellular mechanisms of Hox dependent morphogenesis are still only poorly understood.



Current Research:

Work in my own group has expanded into two major directions. On the one hand, we have begun to systematically identify Hox downstream genes on the whole-genome level with the idea to identify and study all aspects of Hox dependent regulatory networks. To this end we have performed a comparative transcriptome screen probing six of the eight Drosophila Hox genes, which resulted in the first comprehensive atlas of Hox downstream genes containing many hundreds of transcripts. Functional classification using Gene Ontology terms allowed us to link the Hox response to diverse developmental processes, for example nervous system diversification and stem cell maintenance / differentiation. Thus, for the first time since the discovery of Hox genes more than 20 years ago, these results now allow us to study these processes under the control of Hox genes on a quantitative and mechanistic level.

The second major goal of my lab is to understand how Hox proteins acquire spatio-temporal precision and cell-type specificity in regulating their target genes despite their broad expression. Hox proteins seem to solve this problem by interacting with different types of transcriptional partners to form large regulatory complexes thereby enabling Hox transcription factors to achieve their highly diverse and specific transcriptomic outputs. However, so far all attempts to characterize Hox complexes have been unsuccessful. This is very likely due to the highly dynamic regulatory activities of Hox transcription factors in space and time in the living animal, and thus cell-type and stage-specific in vivo approaches are required to elucidate Hox-cofactor and Hox-chromatin interactions critical for their spatio-temporal in vivo function.To this end, we have established the Isolation of Nuclei TAgged in specific Cell Types (INTACT) method, which we now use to dissect the cis-regulatory requirements for tissue- and stage-specific Hox function by identifying in the embryonic mesoderm and nervous system chromatin modifications, binding profiles (ChIPseq) and direct target genes (RNAseq) for different Hox proteinns. Furthermore, we have established the CRISPR/Cas system in the lab, which allows us to tag and modify Hox proteins, thereby allowing a cel type specific isolation of Hox regulatory in vivo complexes. In sum, my lab  has developed new tools, which will  greatly improve our understanding of the general mechanisms guiding temporal and spatial activity of TFs in vivo.



If you are interested in joining the group, please contact Prof. Ingrid Lohmann !




Selected Publications:

  1. Friedrich J., Sorge S., Bujupi F., Eichenlaub M.P., Schulz N.G., Wittbrodt J.  and Lohmann I. Direct and Cell type-specific Hox Function is required for the Development and Maintenance of the Drosophila Feeding Motor Unit.  Cell Reports, (accepted in principle).

  2. Domsch K., Papagiannouli F.  and Lohmann I. (2015) The HOX-Apoptosis Regulatory Interplay in Development and Disease.  Current Topics in Developmental Biology, 114:121-158.

  3. Merabet S. and Lohmann I. (2015) Towards a new twist in Hox and TALE DNA-binding specificity. Developmental Cell,  Feb 9; 32(3), 259-261.

  4. Papagiannouli F., Schardt L., Grajcarek J., Ha N. and Lohmann I. (2014) The Hox Gene Abd-B Controls Stem Cell Niche Function in the Drosophila Testis. Developmental Cell, Jan 27; 28 (2), 189-202.

  5. Sorge S., Ha N., Polychronidou M., Friedrich J., Bezdan D., Kaspar P., Schaefer M.H., Ossowski S., Henz S.R., Mundorf J., Rätzer J., Papagiannouli F. and Lohmann I. (2012) The cis-regulatory code of Hox function in Drosophila. The EMBO Journal, Jul 10;31(15):3323-33.

  6. Zhai Z., Ha N., Papagiannouli F., Hamacher-Brady A., Brady N., Sorge S., Bezdan D. and Lohmann I. (2012) Antagonistic regulation of apoptosis and differentiation by the Cut transcription factor represents a tumor suppressing mechanism in Drosophila. PLoS Genetics 8(3): e1002582.

  7. Sancar G., Sancar C., Brügger B., Ha N., Sachsenheimer T., Gin E., Wdowik S., Lohmann I., Wieland F., Hoefer T., Diernfeller A. and Brunner M. (2011) A global circadian repressor controls anti-phasic expression of metabolic genes in Neurospora. Mol. Cell 44, 687-697.

  8. Stöbe P., Stein, M. A. S., Habring-Müller, A., Bezdan, D., Fuchs, A. L., Hueber, S. D., Wu, H. and Lohmann I. (2009) Multifactorial regulation of a Hox target gene. PLoS Genet. 5(3): e1000412.

  9. Hueber, S. D. and Lohmann I. (2008). Shaping segments: Hox gene function in the genomic age. Bioessays 30, 965-979.

  10. Hueber, S. D., Bezdan, D., Henz, S. R., Blank, M.,Wu, H. and Lohmann, I. (2007). Comparative analysis of Hox downstream genes in Drosophila. Development 134, 381-392.

  11. Lohmann I., McGinnis, N., Bodmer, N. and McGinnis W. (2002). The Drosophila Hox gene Deformed sculpts head morphology via direct regulation of the apoptosis activator reaper. Cell 110, 457-466.

/var/www/cos/ / Prof. Dr. Ingrid Lohmann _e